Satellite Analysis: The Aftermath of the Iranian Attack on the Italian Predator Base in Kuwait

In this focus, we analyze in detail the satellite imagery showing the consequences of the recent Iranian attack on the airbase in Kuwait, an event that led to the destruction of an Italian MQ-9 (Predator B) drone.

The comparative graphic we have put together places a pre-attack satellite view next to a post-attack one (the latter derived from frames released by Iranian media), offering a clear and objective picture of the dynamics and damage caused by the raid on the flight line.

Before the Attack: Operational Infrastructure

Looking at the left panel (“Before the attack”), it is possible to accurately map the area assigned to drone operations.

• The Hangar and the Drone: An MQ-9 is clearly visible parked on the tarmac, adjacent to the large green structure identified as the main hangar dedicated to the housing and maintenance of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA).
• Communication Infrastructure: On the building located to the right of the green hangar, a large satellite antenna is prominent. This is a crucial element for remote piloting and the drone’s data-link.
• Scars of the Past: A historical detail of great interest is represented by the reinforced concrete shelters located behind the main structures. These hardened shelters still show structural damage and impact holes caused by coalition bombings during the 1991 Gulf War, a testament to the base’s operational history.

After the Attack: Assessed Damage

The right panel (“After the attack”), based on imagery of Iranian origin, shows the same area following the strike.

• Destruction of the Hangar: The primary target of the attack appears to have been the Predator’s green hangar itself. The structure is severely damaged, with a collapsed roof and obvious burn marks, confirming the destruction of the assets inside.
• The Missing Satellite Antenna: Comparing the two images, it is noticeable that the satellite antenna on the adjacent building is no longer visible in the post-attack photo. While collateral destruction might be the first assumption, the building underneath does not appear to have suffered catastrophic damage. Therefore, it is a highly plausible hypothesis that the antenna was simply dismantled and relocated for security reasons, or to restore communications in a less exposed area.